1. ,Poland
2. ,Poland
3. ,Krakow,Poland
4. ,Olsztyn,Poland
5. ,Poznan,Poland
扫 描 看 全 文
Maciej Gawęcki, Natalia Prądzyńska, Krzysztof Kiciński, et al. Patient reported outcomes after implementation of an enhanced depth of focus intraocular lens with low postoperative myopia. [J]. AOPR 3(2):86-92(2023)
Maciej Gawęcki, Natalia Prądzyńska, Krzysztof Kiciński, et al. Patient reported outcomes after implementation of an enhanced depth of focus intraocular lens with low postoperative myopia. [J]. AOPR 3(2):86-92(2023) DOI: 10.1016/j.aopr.2023.02.003.
Background,Enhanced depth-of- focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOL) have filled the gap between monofocal and multifocal intraocular implants with optical qualities of monofocal lenses and usually minor dysphotopsias typical for multifocal lenses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a new EDOF IOL in patients with requirements for perfect near and intermediate vision.,Methods,The study included 15 patients (29 eyes as one was amblyopic) with bilateral implantation of LUXSMART EDOF IOL (Bausch & Lomb) with a targeted myopia (between –0.25 and –0.50D) in both eyes. Monocular corrected and uncorrected visual acuity for far, intermediate and near as well as refractive outcomes were evaluated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the surgery. Additionally, binocular visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and defocus curve were measured at the final follow-up visit. At 12 months’ visit patients completed a questionnaire evaluating patient satisfaction, spectacle independence and presence of dysphotopsias.,Results,Binocular uncorrected visual acuities at 12 month’s visit were 0.13 ± 0.16, 0.06 ± 0.08, 0.07 ± 0.09 and 0.15 ± 0.09 logMAR for far distance, 80 cm, 66 cm and 40 cm respectively. Corrected binocular visual acuities at 12 months were 0.00 ± 0.00, 0.05 ± 0.07, 0.05 ± 0.06, 0.13 ± 0.16 respectively for distance, 80 cm, 66 cm and 40 cm. Automated refraction spherical equivalent at 12 months’ visit stood at –0.70 ± 0.48D, which was 0.46D less than calculated biometric target, however spherical equivalent of subjective refraction at 12 months equaled –0.49 ± 0.46D, which was closer to preoperative biometric target. Defocus curve had gentle shape without peaks typical for monofocal IOLs. Binocular contrast sensitivity results were superior to average results for that age group and equaled 1.78 ± 0.16 logMAR without correction and 1.81 ± 0.13 logMAR with correction. Spectacle independence for near and intermediate distances was achieved in all patients and for far distance in 73.3% of patients. Burdensome dysphotopsias were not reported in any case.,Conclusions,EDOF IOLs targeted bilaterally at low myopia can provide excellent near and intermediate visual acuity and independence of any optical correction in majority of cases. This approach can be used in selected patients who are focused on stationary activities.
Background,Enhanced depth-of- focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOL) have filled the gap between monofocal and multifocal intraocular implants with optical qualities of monofocal lenses and usually minor dysphotopsias typical for multifocal lenses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a new EDOF IOL in patients with requirements for perfect near and intermediate vision.,Methods,The study included 15 patients (29 eyes as one was amblyopic) with bilateral implantation of LUXSMART EDOF IOL (Bausch & Lomb) with a targeted myopia (between –0.25 and –0.50D) in both eyes. Monocular corrected and uncorrected visual acuity for far, intermediate and near as well as refractive outcomes were evaluated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the surgery. Additionally, binocular visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and defocus curve were measured at the final follow-up visit. At 12 months’ visit patients completed a questionnaire evaluating patient satisfaction, spectacle independence and presence of dysphotopsias.,Results,Binocular uncorrected visual acuities at 12 month’s visit were 0.13 ± 0.16, 0.06 ± 0.08, 0.07 ± 0.09 and 0.15 ± 0.09 logMAR for far distance, 80 cm, 66 cm and 40 cm respectively. Corrected binocular visual acuities at 12 months were 0.00 ± 0.00, 0.05 ± 0.07, 0.05 ± 0.06, 0.13 ± 0.16 respectively for distance, 80 cm, 66 cm and 40 cm. Automated refraction spherical equivalent at 12 months’ visit stood at –0.70 ± 0.48D, which was 0.46D less than calculated biometric target, however spherical equivalent of subjective refraction at 12 months equaled –0.49 ± 0.46D, which was closer to preoperative biometric target. Defocus curve had gentle shape without peaks typical for monofocal IOLs. Binocular contrast sensitivity results were superior to average results for that age group and equaled 1.78 ± 0.16 logMAR without correction and 1.81 ± 0.13 logMAR with correction. Spectacle independence for near and intermediate distances was achieved in all patients and for far distance in 73.3% of patients. Burdensome dysphotopsias were not reported in any case.,Conclusions,EDOF IOLs targeted bilaterally at low myopia can provide excellent near and intermediate visual acuity and independence of any optical correction in majority of cases. This approach can be used in selected patients who are focused on stationary activities.
Enhanced depth of focusIntraocular lensUncorrected visual acuityCataract surgery
1 A Aaronson, A Viljanen, P Kanclerz, A Grzybowski, R TuuminenCataract complications study: an analysis of adverse effects among 14,520 eyes in relation to surgical experience Ann Transl Med, 8 (22) (2020 Nov), p. 1541, 10.21037/atm-20-845 PMID: 33313286 PMCID: PMC7729371
2 M Gawęcki, A GrzybowskiDiplopia as the complication of cataract surgery J Ophthalmol, 2016 (2016), Article 2728712, 10.1155/2016/2728712 PMID: 26998351 PMCID: PMC4779543
3 VJ Camps, JJ Miret, MT Caballero, DP Piñero, C GarcíaMultifocal intraocular lenses: basic principles J. Alió, J. Pikkel (Eds.), Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. Essentials in Ophthalmology, Springer, Cham (2019) https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-21282-7_3
4 GU Auffarth, TM Rabsilber, T Kohnen, MP HolzerDesign und optische Prinzipien von Multifokallinsen [Design and optical principles of multifocal lenses] Ophthalmologe, 105 (6) (2008 Jun), pp. 522-526 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-008-1744-9
5 S Ravikumar, A Bradley, LN ThibosChromatic aberration and polychromatic image quality with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses J Cataract Refract Surg, 40 (7) (2014 Jul), pp. 1192-1204 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.11.035
6 B Malyugin, T Morozova, V CherednikFyodorov clinic innovation GRADIOL: Gradient refractive index optics multifocal intraocular lens J. Alió, J. Pikkel (Eds.), Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. Essentials in Ophthalmology, Springer, Cham (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09219-5_17
7 U Mester, T Vaterrodt, F Goes, et al.Impact of personality characteristics on patient satisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: results from the "happy patient study J Refract Surg, 30 (10) (2014 Oct), p. 674, 10.3928/1081597X-20140903-05 PMID: 25291750
8 K Kamiya, K Hayashi, K Shimizu, et al.Survey working group of the Japanese society of cataract and refractive surgery. Multifocal intraocular lens explantation: a case series of 50 eyes Am J Ophthalmol, 158 (2) (2014 Aug), pp. 215-220, 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.010 PMID: 24792105
9 JL Alio, AB Plaza-Puche, R Férnandez-Buenaga, et al.Multifocal intraocular lenses: an overview Surv Ophthalmol, 62 (2017), pp. 611-634, 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.03.005 PMID: 28366683
10 JF Zapata-Díaz, MA Rodríguez-Izquierdo, N Ould-Amer, et al.Total depth of focus of five premium multifocal intraocular lenses J Refract Surg, 36 (9) (2020 Sep 1), pp. 578-584, 10.3928/1081597X-20200720-01 PMID: 32901824
11 E Philippaki, L Gobin, J Mandoda, et al.Optical evaluation of new-design multifocal IOLs with extended depth of focus J Opt Soc Am Opt Image Sci Vis, 36 (5) (2019 May 1), pp. 759-767, 10.1364/JOSAA.36.000759 PMID: 31045002
12 P Kanclerz, F Toto, A Grzybowski, et al.Extended depth-of-field intraocular lenses: an update Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)., 9 (3) (2020 May-Jun), pp. 194-202, 10.1097/APO.0000000000000296 PMID: 32511121 PMCID: PMC7299221
13 J Huh, Y Eom, SK Yang, et al.A comparison of clinical outcomes and optical performance between monofocal and new monofocal with enhanced intermediate function intraocular lenses: a case-control study BMC Ophthalmol, 21 (1) (2021 Oct 16), p. 365, 10.1186/s12886-021-02124-w PMID: 34656091 PMCID: PMC8520272
14 MJTD Balgos, JL AlióUpdates in refractive surgery A. Grzybowski (Ed.), Current Concepts in Ophthalmology, Springer, Cham (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25389-9_1
15 L Spadea, MI Giannico, M Formisano, L AlisiVisual performances of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens with a refractive design: a prospective study after bilateral implantation Therapeut Clin Risk Manag, 17 (2021), pp. 727-738, 10.2147/TCRM.S320422 PMID: 34295162 PMCID: PMC8291859
16 G Savini, N Balducci, C Carbonara, et al.Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens Eye, 33 (3) (2019 Mar), pp. 404-410, 10.1038/s41433-018-0221-1 PMID: 30266985 PMCID: PMC6460699
17 M Mäntyjärvi, T LaitinenNormal values for the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test J Cataract Refract Surg, 27 (2) (2001 Feb), pp. 261-266, 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00562-9 PMID: 11226793
18 G Muñoz, C Albarrán-Diego, HF SaklaValidity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation J Cataract Refract Surg, 33 (9) (2007 Sep), pp. 1573-1578, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.024 PMID: 17720072
19 Y Ota, K Minami, S Oki, et al.Subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using echelette optics: clinical and experimental study Acta Ophthalmol, 99 (2021), pp. e837-e843, 10.1111/aos.14660 PMID: 33191658 PMCID: PMC8518701
20 R Sinha, P Sahay, R Saxena, et al.Visual outcomes of binocular implantation of a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens Indian J Ophthalmol, 68 (10) (2020), pp. 2111-2116, 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2139_19 PMID: 32971619 PMCID: PMC7727980
21 M Choi, CY Im, JK Lee, et al.Visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens: a multicenter study Kor J Ophthalmol, 34 (6) (2020 Dec), pp. 439-445, 10.3341/kjo.2020.0042 PMID: 33307603 PMCID: PMC7738229
22 JS Titiyal, M Kaur, N Bharti, et al.Optimal near and distance stereoacuity after binocular implantation of extended range of vision intraocular lenses J Cataract Refract Surg, 45 (6) (2019 Jun), pp. 798-802, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.024 PMID: 30876785
23 HP Sandoval, S Lane, S Slade, et al.Extended depth-of-focus toric intraocular lens targeted for binocular emmetropia or slight myopia in the nondominant eye: visual and refractive clinical outcomes J Cataract Refract Surg, 45 (10) (2019 Oct), pp. 1398-1403, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.05.019 PMID: 31444080
24 TH Newsom, R PotvinEvaluation of quality of vision and visual outcomes with bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended vision intraocular lens with a target of slight myopia in the non-dominant eye Clin Ophthalmol, 16 (2022 Jan 25), pp. 183-190, 10.2147/OPTH.S350850 PMID: 35115758 PMCID: PMC8800857
25 MA Jackson, AM Edmiston, R BediOptimum refractive target in patients with bilateral implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses Clin Ophthalmol, 14 (2020 Feb 18), pp. 455-462, 10.2147/OPTH.S237457 PMID: 32109981 PMCID: PMC7035885
26 JS Wolffsohn, LN DaviesPresbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies Prog Retin Eye Res, 68 (2019 Jan), pp. 124-143 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004
27 PS Kollbaum, A BradleyCorrection of presbyopia: old problems with old (and new) solutions Clin Exp Optom, 103 (1) (2020 Jan), pp. 21-30, 10.1111/cxo.12987 PMID: 31734940
28 KE Nowik, K Nowik, P Kanclerz, et al.Clinical performance of extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses - a retrospective comparative study of Mini well Ready and symfony Clin Ophthalmol, 16 (2022 May 26), pp. 1613-1621, 10.2147/OPTH.S341698 PMID: 35651536 PMCID: PMC9150758
29 E Yeu, S CuozzoMatching the patient to the intraocular lens: preoperative considerations to optimize surgical outcomes Ophthalmology, 128 (11) (2021 Nov), pp. e132-e141, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.025 PMID: 32882308
30 E Vounotrypidis, R Diener, C Wertheimer, et al.Bifocal nondiffractive intraocular lens for enhanced depth of focus in correcting presbyopia: clinical evaluation J Cataract Refract Surg, 43 (5) (2017 May), pp. 627-632, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.024 PMID: 28602323
31 A Dołowiec-Kwapisz, H Piotrowska, M Misiuk-HojłoEvaluation of visual and patient-reported outcomes, spectacle dependence after bilateral implantation with a non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens compared to other intraocular lenses J Clin Med, 11 (17) (2022 Sep 5), p. 5246, 10.3390/jcm11175246 PMID: 36079174 PMCID: PMC9456700
32 LA Rementería-Capelo, P Lorente, V Carrillo, et al.Patient satisfaction and visual performance in patients with ocular pathology after bilateral implantation of a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens J Ophthalmol, 2022 (2022 Apr 28), Article 4659309, 10.1155/2022/4659309 PMID: 35529167 PMCID: PMC9071907
33 E Pedrotti, C Chierego, PM Talli, et al.Extended depth of focus versus monofocal IOLs: objective and subjective visual outcomes J Refract Surg, 36 (4) (2020 Apr 1), pp. 214-222, 10.3928/1081597X-20200212-01 PMID: 32267951
34 V Tahmaz, S Siebelmann, KR Koch, et al.Evaluation of a novel non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens - first results from a prospective study Curr Eye Res, 47 (8) (2022 Aug), pp. 1149-1155, 10.1080/02713683.2022.2074046 PMID: 35642558
35 https://crstodayeurope.com/articles/feb-2021/luxsmart-edof-iol-a-novel-lens-design-for-presbyopia-correction
36 N Campos, T Loureiro, S Rodrigues-Barros, et al.Preliminary clinical outcomes of a new enhanced depth of focus intraocular lens Clin Ophthalmol, 15 (2021), pp. 4801-4807, 10.2147/OPTH.S344379 PMID: 34992340 PMCID: PMC8714966
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution