Comparison between standard and wide-field autofluorescence in detection of retinal displacement after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery
- AOPR Vol. 2, Issue 3, Pages: 100076(2022)
- 作者机构：
1. ,Albacete,Spain
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
DOI：10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100076
CLC：
扫 描 看 全 文
Raquel Maroto Cejudo, Cristina Blanco Marchite, Teresa Prieto Morán, et al. Comparison between standard and wide-field autofluorescence in detection of retinal displacement after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery. [J]. AOPR 2(3):100076(2022)
Raquel Maroto Cejudo, Cristina Blanco Marchite, Teresa Prieto Morán, et al. Comparison between standard and wide-field autofluorescence in detection of retinal displacement after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery. [J]. AOPR 2(3):100076(2022) DOI： 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100076.
摘要
Purpose,To analyse the differences between 30° blue autofluorescence (BAF30), 55° blue autofluorescence (BAF55) and 200° green Ultra-Wide Field autofluorescence (UWF200) imaging to detect retinal displacement (RD) after vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).,Methods,This cross-sectional study considers forty-nine consecutive patients who underwent RRD surgery in the time period 4–8 months previous to image acquisition. The exclusion criteria contemplate previous retinal pathology, under 18-year-olds and non-assessable images in any of the 3 devices. These images were analysed by two masked graders that assessed either the presence or absence of retinal displacement. A third observer reviewed the images that presented discordance.,Results,A total of forty-nine patients were analysed. 7 eyes were excluded due to poor quality in either of the imaging modalities. The final analysis included 42 eyes of forty-two patients with a mean age of 60.3 ± 11.9 years. All patients underwent a 3 port 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy as the technique of choice. Any grade of RD was detectable in 45.2% of images. It was similar between BAF30 and UWF200 (42.9% of eyes). BAF55 showed RD to a lesser extent (38.1%). Agreement index between BAF30 and BAF55 was 0.901, 0.903 between BAF30 and UWF200 and 0.803 between BAF55 and UWF200. Kappa agreement index between graders was 0.775 for BAF30, 0.798 for BAF50 and 0.808 for UWF200 images.,Conclusions,All imaging modalities were able to detect RD after vitrectomy for RRD, with no inferiority of BAF30 and BAF55 over UWF200.
Abstract
Purpose,To analyse the differences between 30° blue autofluorescence (BAF30), 55° blue autofluorescence (BAF55) and 200° green Ultra-Wide Field autofluorescence (UWF200) imaging to detect retinal displacement (RD) after vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).,Methods,This cross-sectional study considers forty-nine consecutive patients who underwent RRD surgery in the time period 4–8 months previous to image acquisition. The exclusion criteria contemplate previous retinal pathology, under 18-year-olds and non-assessable images in any of the 3 devices. These images were analysed by two masked graders that assessed either the presence or absence of retinal displacement. A third observer reviewed the images that presented discordance.,Results,A total of forty-nine patients were analysed. 7 eyes were excluded due to poor quality in either of the imaging modalities. The final analysis included 42 eyes of forty-two patients with a mean age of 60.3 ± 11.9 years. All patients underwent a 3 port 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy as the technique of choice. Any grade of RD was detectable in 45.2% of images. It was similar between BAF30 and UWF200 (42.9% of eyes). BAF55 showed RD to a lesser extent (38.1%). Agreement index between BAF30 and BAF55 was 0.901, 0.903 between BAF30 and UWF200 and 0.803 between BAF55 and UWF200. Kappa agreement index between graders was 0.775 for BAF30, 0.798 for BAF50 and 0.808 for UWF200 images.,Conclusions,All imaging modalities were able to detect RD after vitrectomy for RRD, with no inferiority of BAF30 and BAF55 over UWF200.
关键词
Keywords
Blue fundus autofluorescenceGreen fundus autofluorescenceRhegmatogenous retinal detachmentRetinal displacementRetinal vessel printings
references
1 S.J. Park, N.K. Choi, K.H. Park, S.J. WooFive year nationwide incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment requiring surgery in Korea PLoS One, 8 (11) (2013 Nov 13), Article 80174, 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0080174
2 O. Houle, E. You, M. Hébert, S. Jin, S.R. Qi, A. DiraniRetinal displacement: providing new insights for retinal detachment surgery J. Ophthalmol., 2021 (2021), pp. 1-10, 10.1155/2021/9999797
3 M. Schawkat, C. Valmaggia, C. Lang, H.P. Scholl, J. GuberMultimodal imaging for detecting metamorphopsia after successful retinal detachment repair Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 258 (1) (2020 Jan 1), pp. 57-61, 10.1007/S00417-019-04498-6
4 D. Borowicz, K. Nowomiejska, D. Nowakowska, et al.Functional and morphological results of treatment of macula-on and macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with pars plana vitrectomy and sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade BMC Ophthalmol (1) (2019 May 24), p. 19, 10.1186/S12886-019-1120-3
5 E. Lee, T.H. Williamson, P. Hysi, et al.Macular displacement following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair Br J Ophthalmol, 97 (10) (2013 Oct), pp. 1297-1302, 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303637
6 C. Shiragami, F. Shiraga, H. Yamaji, et al.Unintentional displacement of the retina after standard vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment Ophthalmology, 117 (1) (2010), pp. 86-92, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.025 e1
7 R. Dell'Omo, M. Mura, S.Y. Lesnik Oberstein, H. Bijl, H.S. TanEarly simultaneous fundus autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography features after pars plana vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment Retina, 32 (4) (2012 Apr), pp. 719-728, 10.1302/0301-620X.97B1
8 R. dell'Omo, A. Scupola, D. Viggiano, et al.Incidence and factors influencing retinal displacement in eyes treated for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with vitrectomy and gas or silicone oil Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 58 (6) (2017), pp. BIO191-B199, 10.1167/iovs.17-21466
9 E.J. Casswell, T.F.C. Heeren, E. Lee, K. Khabra, D. Yorston, D.G. CharterisPostretinal detachment retinal displacement: how best to detect it? Ophthalmologica (2019), pp. 1-8, 10.1159/000504713
10 S. Schmitz-Valckenberg, M. Pfau, M. Fleckenstein, et al.Fundus autofluorescence imaging Prog Retin Eye Res (2021 Mar 1), p. 81, 10.1016/J.PRETEYERES.2020.100893
11 R.F. SpaideOptimized filters for fundus autofluorescence imaging Retin Today (2009), pp. 79-81, 10.1016/J.PRETEYERES.2020.100893
12 C. Wilkinson, A. Schachat, D. Hinton, K.B. Freund, D. Sarraf, P. WiedemanWide-field imaging Ryan's Retina, Elsevier (2017), p. 146
13 F.M. Heussen, C.S. Tan, S.V.R. SaddaPrevalence of peripheral abnormalities on ultra-widefield greenlight (532 nm) autofluorescence imaging at a tertiary care center Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 53 (10) (2012), pp. 6526-6531, 10.1167/iovs.12-9909
14 R. Dell'Omo, F. Cifariello, E. Dell'Omo, et al.Influence of retinal vessel printings on metamorphopsia and retinal architectural abnormalities in eyes with idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 54 (12) (2013 Nov 21), pp. 7803-7811, 10.1167/iovs.13-12817
15 K. Brosh, C.L.M. Francisconi, J. Qian, et al.Retinal displacement following pneumatic retinopexy vs pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment JAMA Ophthalmol (2020), pp. E1-E8, 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.1046
16 F.C. Delori, D.G. Goger, B.R. Hammond, D.M. Snodderly, S.A. BurnsMacular pigment density measured by autofluorescence spectrometry: comparison with reflectometry and heterochromatic flicker photometry J Opt Soc Am A, 18 (6) (2001 Jun 1), p. 1212, 10.1364/josaa.18.001212
17 U.E.K. Wolf-Schnurrbusch, V.V. Wittwer, R. Ghanem, et al.Blue-light versus green-light autofluorescence: lesion size of areas of geographic atrophy Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 52 (13) (2011), pp. 9497-9502, 10.1167/iovs.11-8346
18 E.A. Boettner, J.R. WolterTransmission of the ocular media Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1 (6) (1962), pp. 776-783
19 M.T. Witmer, G. Parlitsis, S. Patel, S. KissComparison of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography with the Heidelberg Spectralis® noncontact ultra-widefield module versus the Optos® Optomap Clin Ophthalmol, 7 (2013), pp. 389-394, 10.2147/OPTH.S41731
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- Meta-XMLDownload
- BibTeXDownload
- EndnoteDownload
- RefMan Download
- NoteExpressDownload
- NoteFirstDownload
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
- Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
- Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.