Paediatric cornea crosslinking current strategies: A review
Paediatric cornea crosslinking current strategies: A review
- 眼科实践与研究新进展 2023年3卷第2期 页码：55-62
- 作者机构：
1. ,India
2. ,Chandigarh,India,160022
3. ,India
4. ,USA
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
DOI：10.1016/j.aopr.2022.11.002
中图分类号：
扫 描 看 全 文
Paediatric cornea crosslinking current strategies: A review[J]. 眼科实践与研究新进展, 2023,3(2):55-62.
Pawan Prasher, Ashok Sharma, Rajan Sharma, et al. Paediatric cornea crosslinking current strategies: A review[J]. AOPR, 2023,3(2):55-62.
Paediatric cornea crosslinking current strategies: A review[J]. 眼科实践与研究新进展, 2023,3(2):55-62. DOI： 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.11.002.
Pawan Prasher, Ashok Sharma, Rajan Sharma, et al. Paediatric cornea crosslinking current strategies: A review[J]. AOPR, 2023,3(2):55-62. DOI： 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.11.002.
摘要
Background,In the general population, 1 in 2000 people has keratoconus. Indians and other people from Southeast Asia have a higher incidence of keratoconus. Children with keratoconus typically present earlier in life and with a more severe disease. Rubbing the eyes has been identified as a risk factor. Children have a higher incidence and a faster rate of keratoconus progression. Visual rehabilitation in children with keratoconus is challenging. They have a low compliance with contact lens use. Many of these children require penetrating keratoplasty at an early age. Therefore, stopping the progression of keratoconus in children is of paramount importance.,Main text,Compared to treatment, keratoconus progression prophylaxis is not only preferable, but also easier. Corneal collagen cross-linking has been shown to be safe and effective in stopping its progression in children. The Dresden protocol, which involves central corneal deepithelization (7–9 mm), saturation of the stroma with riboflavin (0.25%), and 30 min UV-A exposure, has proven to be the most successful. Two significant disadvantages of the typical Dresden regimen are the prolonged operating time and the significant post-operative pain. Accelerated-CXL (9 mW/cm,2, x 10 min) has been studied to reduce operative time and has been shown to be equally effective in some studies. Compared to accelerated CXL or traditional CXL, epi-off procedures, transepithelial treatment without the need for de-epithelialization and without postoperative discomfort, have been shown to be safer but less effective. Corneal crosslinking should only be performed after treating children with active vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Corneal opacity, chronic corneal edema, sterile infiltrates, and microbial keratitis have been reported after cross-linking of corneal collagen.,Conclusions,The "Dresden protocol", also known as the conventional corneal cross-linking approach, should be used to halt the progression of keratoconus in young patients. However, if the procedure needs to be completed more rapidly, accelerated corneal crosslinking may be considered. Transepithelial corneal cross-linking has been proven to be less effective at stabilizing keratoconus, although being more safer.
Abstract
Background,In the general population, 1 in 2000 people has keratoconus. Indians and other people from Southeast Asia have a higher incidence of keratoconus. Children with keratoconus typically present earlier in life and with a more severe disease. Rubbing the eyes has been identified as a risk factor. Children have a higher incidence and a faster rate of keratoconus progression. Visual rehabilitation in children with keratoconus is challenging. They have a low compliance with contact lens use. Many of these children require penetrating keratoplasty at an early age. Therefore, stopping the progression of keratoconus in children is of paramount importance.,Main text,Compared to treatment, keratoconus progression prophylaxis is not only preferable, but also easier. Corneal collagen cross-linking has been shown to be safe and effective in stopping its progression in children. The Dresden protocol, which involves central corneal deepithelization (7–9 mm), saturation of the stroma with riboflavin (0.25%), and 30 min UV-A exposure, has proven to be the most successful. Two significant disadvantages of the typical Dresden regimen are the prolonged operating time and the significant post-operative pain. Accelerated-CXL (9 mW/cm,2, x 10 min) has been studied to reduce operative time and has been shown to be equally effective in some studies. Compared to accelerated CXL or traditional CXL, epi-off procedures, transepithelial treatment without the need for de-epithelialization and without postoperative discomfort, have been shown to be safer but less effective. Corneal crosslinking should only be performed after treating children with active vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Corneal opacity, chronic corneal edema, sterile infiltrates, and microbial keratitis have been reported after cross-linking of corneal collagen.,Conclusions,The "Dresden protocol", also known as the conventional corneal cross-linking approach, should be used to halt the progression of keratoconus in young patients. However, if the procedure needs to be completed more rapidly, accelerated corneal crosslinking may be considered. Transepithelial corneal cross-linking has been proven to be less effective at stabilizing keratoconus, although being more safer.
关键词
Keywords
KeratoconusCorneal collagen cross-linkingCorneal transplantPediatric keratoconus
references
1 YS Rabinowitz Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol., 42 (4) (1998), pp. 297-319, 10.1016/S0039-6257(97)00119-7
2 KA Beckman, PK Gupta, M Farid, et al.Corneal crosslinking: current protocols and clinical approach J Cataract Refract Surg, 45 (11) (2019), pp. 1670-1679, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.027
3 LJ Davis, KB Schechtman, BS Wilson, et al.Longitudinal changes in visual acuity in keratoconus Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 47 (2) (2006), pp. 489-500, 10.1167/iovs.05-0381
4 SK Subasinghe, KC Ogbuehi, GJ DiasCurrent perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 256 (8) (2018), pp. 1363-1384, 10.1007/s00417-018-3966-0
5 VF Diakonis, M ShehadehCorneal cross linking in pediatric keratoconus A. Barbara (Ed.), Controversies in the Management of Keratoconus, Springer, Cham (2018), pp. 159-165, 10.1007/978-3-319-98032-4_13
6 L McAnena, F Doyle, M O’KeefeCross-linking in children with keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis Acta Ophthalmol, 95 (3) (2017), pp. 229-239, 10.1111/aos.13224
7 MA Javadi, BF Motlagh, MR Jafarinasab, et al.Outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus Cornea, 24 (2005), pp. 941-946, 10.1097/01.ico.0000159730.45177.cd
8 N Mamalis, CW Anderson, KR Kreisler, et al.Changing trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty Arch Ophthalmol, 110 (1992), pp. 1409-1411, 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080220071023
9 MM Shehadeh, VF Diakonis, SA Jalil, et al.Prevalence of keratoconus among a palestinian tertiary student population Open Ophthalmol J, 9 (2015), pp. 172-176, 10.2174/1874364101509010172
10 H Hashemi, A Beiranvand, M Khabazkhoob, et al.Prevalence of keratoconus in a population-based study in Shahroud Cornea, 32 (2013), pp. 1441-1445, 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a0d014
11 DA Godefrooij, GA de Wit, CS Uiterwaal, et al.Age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus: a nationwide registration study Am J Ophthalmol, 175 (2017), pp. 169-172, 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.015
12 JB Jonas, V Nangia, A Matin, et al.Prevalence and associations of keratoconus in rural Maharashtra in central India: the Central India eye and medical study Am J Ophthalmol, 148 (5) (2009), pp. 760-765, 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.024
13 M Millodot, E Shneor, S Albou, et al.Prevalence and associated factors of keratoconus in Jerusalem: a cross-sectional study Ophthalmic Epidemiol, 18 (2) (2011), pp. 91-97, 10.3109/09286586.2011.560747
14 N Wakend, AM Fayad, A Fadlallah, et al.Keratoconus screening in Lebanese students’ population J Fr Ophthalmol, 35 (1) (2012), pp. 23-29, 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.03.016
15 L Xu, YX Wang, Y Guo, et al.Prevalence and associations of steep cornea/keratoconus in greater Beijing. The Beijing Eye Study PLoS One, 7 (7) (2012), Article e39313, 10.1371/journal.pone.0039313
16 H Hashemi, M Khabazkhoob, A FotouhiTopographic keratoconus is not rare in an Iranian population: the Tehran eye study Ophthalmic Epidemiol, 20 (6) (2013), pp. 385-391, 10.3109/09286586.2013.848458
17 E Shneor, M Millodot, A Gordon-Shaag, et al.Prevalence of keratoconus among young Arab students in Israel Int J KeratoEctatic Corneal Dis, 3 (1) (2014), pp. 9-14, 10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1070
18 V Kaya, M Karakaya, CA UtineEvaluation of the corneal topographic characteristics of keratoconus with orbscan II in patients with and without atopy Cornea, 26 (8) (2007), pp. 945-948, 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3180de1e04
19 AK Cingu, Y Cinar, FM Turkcu, et al.Effects of vernal and allergic conjunctivitis on severity of keratoconus Int J Ophthalmol, 6 (3) (2013), pp. 370-374, 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.03.21
20 M Naderan, MT Rajabi, P ZarrinbakhshEffect of allergic diseases on keratoconus severity Ocul Immunol Inflamm, 25 (3) (2017), pp. 418-423, 10.3109/09273948.2016.1145697
21 B Jafri, H Lichter, RD StultingAsymmetric keratoconus attributed to eye rubbing Cornea, 23 (6) (2004), pp. 560-564, 10.1097/01.ico.0000121711.58571.8d
22 RP Wisse, JJ Kuiper, R Gans, et al.Cytokine expression in keratoconus and its corneal microenvironment: a systematic review Ocul Surf, 13 (4) (2015), pp. 272-283, 10.1016/j.jtos.2015.04.006
23 I Lema, JA DuranInflammatory molecules in the tears of patients with keratoconus Ophthalmology, 112 (4) (2005), pp. 654-659, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.11.050
24 AR Pearson, B Soneji, N Sarvananthan, et al.Does ethnic origin influence the incidence or severity of keratoconus? Eye, 14 (Pt 4) (2000), pp. 625-628, 10.1038/eye.2000.154
25 S Mukhtar, BK AmbatiPediatric keratoconus: a review of the literature Int Ophthalmol, 38 (5) (2018), pp. 2257-2266, 10.1007/s10792-017-0699-8
26 C Perez-Straziota, RN Gaster, YS RabinowitzCorneal cross-linking for pediatric keratcoconus review Cornea, 37 (6) (2018), pp. 802-809, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001579
27 A Olivo-Payne, A Abdala-Figuerola, E Hernandez-Bogantes, et al.Optimal management of pediatric keratoconus: challenges and solutions Clin Ophthalmol, 13 (2019), pp. 1183-1191, 10.2147/OPTH.S183347
28 Y Wang, YS Rabinowitz, JI Rotter, et al.Genetic epidemiological study of keratoconus: evidence for major gene determination Am J Med Genet, 93 (2000), pp. 403-409 PMID: 10951465
29 JL Olivares Jimenez, JC Guerrero Jurado, FJ Bermudez Rodriguez, et al.Keratoconus: age of onset and natural history Optom Vis Sci, 74 (1997), pp. 147-151, 10.1097/00006324-199703000-00025
30 N Soeters, R van der Valk, NG TahzibCorneal cross-linking for treatment of progressive keratoconus in various age groups J Refract Surg, 30 (2014), pp. 454-460, 10.3928/1081597X-20140527-03
31 S Sabti, C Tappeiner, BE FruehCorneal cross-linking in a 4-year-old child with keratoconus and Down syndrome Cornea, 34 (2015), pp. 1157-1160, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000491
32 S Leoni-Mesplie, B Mortemousque, N Mesplie, et al.Epidemiological aspects of keratoconus in children J Fr Ophtalmol, 35 (2012), pp. 776-785, 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.12.012
33 SA Balasubramanian, DC Pye, MD WillcoxEffects of eye rubbing on the levels of protease, protease activity and cytokines in tears: relevance in keratoconus Clin Exp Optom, 96 (2013), pp. 214-218, 10.1111/cxo.12038
34 SJ Tuft, LC Moodaley, WM Gregory, et al.Prognostic factors for the progression of keratoconus Ophthalmology, 101 (1994), pp. 439-447, 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31313-3
35 SW Reeves, S Stinnett, RA AdelmanRisk factors for progression to penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus Am J Ophthalmol, 140 (4) (2005), pp. 607-611, 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.05.029
36 N Chatzis, F HafeziProgression of keratoconus and efficacy of pediatric [corrected] corneal collagen cross-linking in children and adolescents [published correction appears in J Refract Surg. 2013 Jan;29(1):72] J Refract Surg, 28 (11) (2012), pp. 753-758, 10.3928/1081597X-20121011-01
37 M Vanathi, A Panda, S Vengayil, et al.Pediatric keratoplasty Surv Ophthalmol, 54 (2) (2009), pp. 245-271, 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.12.011
38 SK Subasinghe, KC Ogbuehi, GJ DiasCurrent perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 256 (8) (2018), pp. 1363-1384, 10.1007/s00417-018-3966-0
39 N Sorkin, D VarssanoCorneal collagen crosslinking: a systematic review Ophthalmologica, 232 (1) (2014), pp. 10-27, 10.1159/000357979
40 HW Sung, WH Chang, CY Ma, et al.Crosslinking of biological tissues using genipin and/or carbodiimide J Biomed Mater Res, 64 (3) (2003), pp. 427-438, 10.1002/jbm.a.10346
41 TB McKay, S Priyadarsini, D KaramichosMechanisms of collagen crosslinking in diabetes and keratoconus Cells, 8 (10) (2019), p. 1239, 10.3390/cells8101239 Published 2019 Oct 11
42 G Wollensak, E Spoerl, T SeilerRiboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus Am J Ophthalmol, 135 (2003), pp. 620-627, 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02220-1
43 K Suri, KM Hammersmith, PK NagraCorneal collagen cross-linking: ectasia and beyond Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 23 (4) (2012), pp. 280-287, 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328354865e
44 SMB Léoni-Mesplié, D Touboul, et al.Scalability and severity of kertoconus in children Am J Ophthalmol, 154 (1) (2012), pp. 56-62, 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.01.025
45 VP Kankariya, GD Kymionis, VF Diaknois, et al.Management of pediatric keratoconus—evolving role of corneal collagen cross-linking: an update Indian J Ophthalmol, 61 (8) (2013), pp. 435-440, 10.4103/0301-4738.116070
46 S Hamada, et al.Corneal cross-linking in children M. Sinjab, A. Cummings (Eds.), Corneal Collagen Cross Linking, Springer, Cham (2017), pp. 229-268, 10.1007/978-3-319-39775-7_8
47 VG Lalgudi, KK NischalPediatric corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: not an experimental procedure J AAPOS, 23 (2) (2019), pp. 63-65, 10.1016/j.jaapos.2018.12.001
48 Uçakhan Öö, T Celik Buyuktepe, Z Yavuz, et al.Pediatric versus adult corneal collagen crosslinking: long-term visual, refractive, tomographic and aberrometric outcomes Curr Eye Res, 46 (1) (2021), pp. 14-22, 10.1080/02713683.2020.1782940
49 DA Godefrooij, N Soeters, SM Imhof, et al.Corneal cross-linking for pediatric keratoconus: long-term results Cornea, 35 (7) (2016), pp. 954-958, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000819
50 P Padmanabhan, S Rachapalle Reddi, R Rajagopal, et al.Corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in pediatric patients-long term results Cornea, 36 (2) (2017), pp. 138-143, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001102
51 PG Zotta, VF Diakonis, GD Kymionis, et al.Long-term outcomes of corneal cross-linking for keratoconus in pediatricpatients J AAPOS, 21 (5) (2017), pp. 397-401, 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.07.205
52 Uçakhan Öö, BN Bayraktutar, A SaglikPediatric corneal collagen cross-linking: long-term follow-up of visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes Cornea, 35 (2) (2016), pp. 162-168, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000702
53 C Mazzotta, C Traversi, S Baiocchi, et al.Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet a light for pediatric keratoconus:ten-year results Cornea, 37 (5) (2018), pp. 560-566, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001505
54 F Raiskup, A Theuring, LE Pillunat, et al.Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in progressive keratoconus: ten-year results J Cataract Refract Surg, 41 (1) (2015), pp. 41-46, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.09.033
55 C Nicula, D Nicula, RN PopResults at 7 years after cross-linking procedure in keratoconic patients J Fr Ophtalmol, 40 (7) (2017), pp. 535-541, 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.03.003
56 S Schumacher, L Oeftiger, M MrochenEquivalence of biomechanical changes induced by rapid and standard corneal cross-linking, using riboflavin and ultraviolet radiation Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 52 (2011), pp. 9048-9052, 10.1167/iovs.11-7818
57 CA Nicula, AM Rednik, AE Bulboacă, et al.Comparative results between “Epi-Off” conventional and accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus in pediatric patients Therapeut Clin Risk Manag, 15 (2019), pp. 1483-1490, 10.2147/TCRM.S224533
58 SA Eissa, A YassinProspective, randomized contralateral eye study of accelerated and conventional corneal cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus Int Ophthalmol, 39 (5) (2019), pp. 971-979, 10.1007/s10792-018-0898-y
59 O Sarac, M Caglayan, BS Uysal, et al.Accelerated versus standard corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus patients: 24 months follow-up results Contact Lens Anterior Eye, 41 (5) (2018), pp. 442-447, 10.1016/j.clae.2018.06.001
60 MA Henriquez, AM Rodríguez, Jr. Izquierdo LAccelerated epi-on versus standard epi-off corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus in pediatric patients Cornea, 36 (12) (2017), pp. 1503-1508, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001366
61 M Eraslan, E Toker, E CermanEfficacy of epithelium-off and epithelium-on corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus Eye Contact Lens, 43 (3) (2017), pp. 155-161, 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000255
62 S Nath, C Shen, A Koziarz, et al.Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal collagen cross-linking for corneal ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ophthalmology, 128 (8) (2021 Aug), pp. 1150-1160, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.12.023 Epub 2020 Dec 28. PMID: 33383093
63 P Vinciguerra, M Rechichi, P Rosetta, et al.High fluence iontophoretic corneal collagen cross-linking: in vivo OCT imaging of riboflavin penetration J Refract Surg, 29 (6) (2013), pp. 376-377, 10.3928/1081597X-20130509-01
64 L Buzzonetti, G Petrocelli, P Valente, et al.Iontophoretic transepithelial collagen cross-linking versus epithelium-off collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients: 3-year follow-up Cornea, 38 (7) (2019), pp. 859-863, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001965
65 A Magli, E Chiariello Vecchio, R Carelli, et al.Pediatric keratoconus and iontophoretic corneal crosslinking: refractive and topographic evidence in patients underwent general and topical anesthesia, 18 months of follow-up Int Ophthalmol, 36 (4) (2016), pp. 585-590, 10.1007/s10792-015-0166-3
66 AJ Kanellopoulos, F Vingopoulos, AM SideriLong-term stability with the Athens protocol (Topography-Guided partial PRK combined with cross-linking) in pediatric patients with keratoconus Cornea, 38 (8) (2019), pp. 1049-1057, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001996
67 M Iqbal, A Elmassry, A Tawfik, et al.Analysis of the outcomes of combined cross-linking with intracorneal ring segment implantation for the treatment of pediatric keratoconus Curr Eye Res, 44 (2) (2019), pp. 125-134, 10.1080/02713683.2018.1540706
68 G Steinwender, L Pertl, Y El-Shabrawi, et al.Complications from corneal cross-linking for keratoconus in pediatric patients J Refract Surg, 32 (1) (2016), pp. 68-69, 10.3928/1081597X-20151210-03
69 PK Maharana, P Sahay, M Sujeeth, et al.Microbial keratitis after accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus Cornea, 37 (2) (2018), pp. 162-167, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001439
70 R Arora, D Gupta, JL Goyal, et al.Results of corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients J Refract Surg, 28 (2012), pp. 759-762, 10.3928/1081597X-20121011-02
71 P Vinciguerra, E Albé, BE Frueh, et al.Two-year corneal cross-linking results in patients younger than 18 years with documented progressive keratoconus Am J Ophthalmol, 154 (2012), pp. 520-526, 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.03.020
72 A Caporossi, C Mazzotta, S Baiocchi, et al.Riboflavin-UVA-induced corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients Cornea, 31 (2012), pp. 227-231, 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31822159f6
73 D Viswanathan, NL Kumar, JJ MalesOutcome of corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus in paediatric patients BioMed Res Int, 2014 (2014), Article 140461, 10.1155/2014/140461
74 KS Kodavoor, AZ Ariswala, D RamamurthyOne year clinical study of efficacy of corneal cross-linking in Indian children with progressive keratoconus Cornea, 33 (9) (2014), pp. 919-922, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000197
75 O Sarac, M Caglayan, HB Cakmak, et al.Factors influencing progression of keratoconus 2 years after corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients Cornea, 35 (2016), pp. 1503-1507, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001051
76 S Wise, C Diaz, K Termote, et al.Corneal cross-linking in pediatric patients with progressive keratoconus Cornea, 35 (2016), pp. 1441-1443, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000923
77 MA Henriquez, S Villegas, M Rincon, et al.Long-term efficacy and safety after corneal crosslinking in pediatric patients: three-year follow-up Eur J Ophthalmol, 28 (2018), pp. 415-418, 10.1177/1120672118760149
78 L Or, A Rozenberg, A Abulafia, et al.Corneal cross-linking in pediatric patients: evaluating treated and untreated eyes-5-year follow-up results Cornea, 37 (2018), pp. 1013-1017, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001629
79 PR Barbisan, RD Pinto, CC Gusmão, et al.Corneal collagen cross-linking in young patients for progressive keratoconus Cornea, 39 (2020), pp. 186-191, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002130
80 EB Ozgurhan, N Kara, KI Cankaya, et al.Accelerated corneal cross-linking in pediatric patients with keratoconus: 24-month outcomes J Refract Surg, 30 (2014), pp. 843-849, 10.3928/1081597X-20141120-01
81 R Shetty, H Nagaraja, C Jayadev, et al.Accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients: two-year follow-up results BioMed Res Int, 2014 (2014), Article 894095, 10.1155/2014/894095
82 AE BadawiAccelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus: one year study Saudi J Ophthalmol, 31 (2017), pp. 11-18, 10.1016/j.sjopt.2017.01.002
83 A Agca, B Tulu, D Yasa, et al.Accelerated corneal crosslinking in children with keratoconus: 5-year results and comparison of 2 protocols J Cataract Refract Surg, 46 (2020), pp. 517-523, 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000101
84 L McAnena, M O’KeefeCorneal crosslinking in children with keratoconus J AAPOS, 19 (2015), pp. 228-232, 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.02.010
85 I Amer, A Elaskary, A Mostafa, et al.Long-term visual, refractive and topographic outcomes of “epi-off” corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus: standard versus accelerated protocol Clin Ophthalmol, 14 (2020), pp. 3747-3754, 10.2147/OPTH.S275797
86 L Buzzonetti, G PetrocelliTransepithelial corneal cross-linking in pediatric patients: early results J Refract Surg, 28 (2012), pp. 763-767, 10.3928/1081597X-20121011-03
87 M Tian, W Jian, L Sun, et al.One-year follow-up of accelerated transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive pediatric keratoconus BMC Ophthalmol, 18 (2018), p. 75, 10.1186/s12886-018-0739-9
88 A Magli, R Forte, A Tortori, et al.Epithelium-off corneal collagen cross-linking versus transepithelial cross-linking for pediatric keratoconus Cornea, 32 (2013), pp. 597-601, 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31826cf32d
89 MA Henriquez, G Hernandez-Sahagun, J CamargoAccelerated epi-on versus standard epi-off corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus in pediatric patients: five years of follow-up Cornea, 39 (2020), pp. 1493-1498, 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002463
90 M Iqbal, A Elmassry, H Saad, et al.Standard cross-linking protocol versus accelerated and transepithelial cross-linking protocols for treatment of paediatric keratoconus: a 2-year comparative study Acta Ophthalmol, 98 (2020), pp. e352-e362, 10.1111/aos.14275
91 S Choi, JH Shin, Y Cheong, et al.Structural and biomechanical effects of photooxidative collagen cross-linking with photosensitizer riboflavin and 370 nm UVA light on human corneoscleral tissues Microsc Microanal, 19 (5) (2013), pp. 1334-1340, 10.1017/S1431927613001669
92 TG Seiler, MA Komninou, MH Nambiar, et al.Oxygen kinetics during corneal cross-linking with and without supplementary oxygen Am J Ophthalmol, 223 (2021 Mar), pp. 368-376, 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.11.001 Epub 2020 Nov 21. PMID: 33227242
93 S Kling, O Richoz, A Hammer, et al.Increased biomechanical efficacy of corneal cross-linking in thin corneas due to higher oxygen availability J Refract Surg, 31 (12) (2015 Dec), pp. 840-846, 10.3928/1081597X-20151111-08 PMID: 26653730
94 H Razmjoo, B Rahimi, M Kharraji, et al.Corneal haze and visual outcome after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: a comparison between total epithelium off and partial epithelial removal methods Adv Biomed Res, 3 (2014 Nov 29), p. 221, 10.4103/2277-9175.145677 PMID: 25538907; PMCID: PMC4260293
95 Y Zhu, PS Reinach, H Zhu, et al.Continuous-light versus pulsed-light accelerated corneal crosslinking with ultraviolet-A and riboflavin J Cataract Refract Surg, 44 (3) (2018 Mar), pp. 382-389, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.12.028.PMID:29703291
96 N Dervenis, P Dervenis, N Dragoumis, et al.Accelerated, pulsed collagen cross-linking versus the dresden protocol in keratoconus: a case series Med Princ Pract, 29 (4) (2020), pp. 332-337, 10.1159/000505598 Epub 2020 Feb 4. PMID: 32018247; PMCID: PMC7445675
97 AB Cummings, N MascharkaOutcomes after topography-based LASIK and LASEK with the wavelight oculyzer and topolyzer platforms J Refract Surg, 26 (7) (2010), pp. 478-485, 10.3928/1081597X-20090814-05
98 T Singh, M Taneja, S Murthy, et al.Evaluation of safety and efficacy of different protocols of collagen cross linking for keratoconus Rom J Ophthalmol, 64 (2) (2020 Apr-Jun), pp. 158-167 PMID: 32685782; PMCID: PMC7339692
99 S Srivatsa, S Jacob, A AgarwalContact lens assisted corneal cross linking in thin ectatic corneas - a review Indian J Ophthalmol, 68 (12) (2020 Dec), pp. 2773-2778, 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2138_20 PMID: 33229652; PMCID: PMC7856986
100 GS Sachdev, R Sachdev, MS SachdevIntra corneal ring segment implantation with lenticule assisted stromal augmentation for crosslinking in thin corneas Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep, 19 (2020 Jun 5), Article 100726, 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100726 PMID: 32566797; PMCID: PMC7298359
101 H Wu, L Li, S Luo, et al.Safety and efficacy of repeated crosslinking assisted by transepithelial double-cycle iontophoresis in keratoconus progression after primary corneal crosslinking Eye, 35 (11) (2021 Nov), pp. 3020-3027, 10.1038/s41433-020-01365-1 Epub 2021 Jan 7. PMID: 33414527; PMCID: PMC8526808
102 JE Moore, D Schiroli, CB MoorePotential effects of corneal cross-linking upon the limbus BioMed Res Int, 2016 (2016), Article 5062064, 10.1155/2016/5062064 Epub 2016 Sep 5. PMID: 27689081; PMCID: PMC5027324
103 V Jeyalatha, M Jambulingam, N Gupta, et al.Study on polymethylmethacrylate ring in protecting limbal stem cells during collagen cross-linking Ophthalmic Res, 50 (2) (2013), pp. 113-116, 10.1159/000351644 Epub 2013 Jul 17. PMID: 23867297
104 A Sharma, JM Nottage, K Mirchia, et al.Persistent corneal edema after collagen cross-linking for keratoconus Am J Ophthalmol, 154 (6) (2012 Dec), pp. 922-926, 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.06.005
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies