Cerebral processing of emotions in phantom eye pain patients: An event related potential study
Cerebral processing of emotions in phantom eye pain patients: An event related potential study
- 眼科实践与研究新进展 2022年2卷第3期 页码：100075
- 作者机构：
1. ,Hangzhou,China
2. ,Hangzhou,China
3. ,Hangzhou,China
4. ,Norway
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
DOI：10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100075
中图分类号：
扫 描 看 全 文
Cerebral processing of emotions in phantom eye pain patients: An event related potential study[J]. 眼科实践与研究新进展, 2022,2(3):100075.
Lixia Lou, Yijie Wang, Bingren Zhang, et al. Cerebral processing of emotions in phantom eye pain patients: An event related potential study[J]. AOPR, 2022,2(3):100075.
Cerebral processing of emotions in phantom eye pain patients: An event related potential study[J]. 眼科实践与研究新进展, 2022,2(3):100075. DOI： 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100075.
Lixia Lou, Yijie Wang, Bingren Zhang, et al. Cerebral processing of emotions in phantom eye pain patients: An event related potential study[J]. AOPR, 2022,2(3):100075. DOI： 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100075.
摘要
Purpose,Phantom eye pain (PEP) is a major clinical problem after eye removal with no standard treatment protocol to date. As pain is a multidimensional experience associated with emotional and cognitive components, this study aimed to explore the possible neuropsychological mechanisms of PEP in a perspective of emotional cognition, in order to provide a basis for clinical treatment.,Methods,Visual oddball event-related potentials (ERPs) under different external emotional stimuli (Disgust, Fear, Sadness, Happiness, Erotica and Neutral) were tested in 12 patients and 12 healthy volunteers. Participants' affective states were measured with the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), the Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32), and the Plutchik–van Praag Depression Inventory (PVP). The amplitudes and latencies of N1, P2, N2 and P3 components were analyzed by three-way ANOVA, i.e., group (2) × emotion (6) × electrode (3). Multiple comparisons were performed using Bonferroni's test.,Results,Longer N1 latencies, increased N1 amplitudes; shorter P2 latencies under Disgust and Happiness, decreased P2 amplitudes; shorter N2 latencies under Erotica, increased N2 amplitudes were found in patients compared with controls. There was no main effect of group or interaction effect on P3 latencies and P3 amplitudes. The MDQ and HCL-32 scores were lower, and the N1 latencies under Sadness were negatively correlated with PVP scores in patients.,Conclusions,PEP patients showed reversed patterns in exogenous attention allocation and enhanced involuntary attention to emotional stimuli compared with controls. This study demonstrated cortical processing of emotions in PEP patients and could provide a basis for developing emotional intervention therapy.
Abstract
Purpose,Phantom eye pain (PEP) is a major clinical problem after eye removal with no standard treatment protocol to date. As pain is a multidimensional experience associated with emotional and cognitive components, this study aimed to explore the possible neuropsychological mechanisms of PEP in a perspective of emotional cognition, in order to provide a basis for clinical treatment.,Methods,Visual oddball event-related potentials (ERPs) under different external emotional stimuli (Disgust, Fear, Sadness, Happiness, Erotica and Neutral) were tested in 12 patients and 12 healthy volunteers. Participants' affective states were measured with the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), the Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32), and the Plutchik–van Praag Depression Inventory (PVP). The amplitudes and latencies of N1, P2, N2 and P3 components were analyzed by three-way ANOVA, i.e., group (2) × emotion (6) × electrode (3). Multiple comparisons were performed using Bonferroni's test.,Results,Longer N1 latencies, increased N1 amplitudes; shorter P2 latencies under Disgust and Happiness, decreased P2 amplitudes; shorter N2 latencies under Erotica, increased N2 amplitudes were found in patients compared with controls. There was no main effect of group or interaction effect on P3 latencies and P3 amplitudes. The MDQ and HCL-32 scores were lower, and the N1 latencies under Sadness were negatively correlated with PVP scores in patients.,Conclusions,PEP patients showed reversed patterns in exogenous attention allocation and enhanced involuntary attention to emotional stimuli compared with controls. This study demonstrated cortical processing of emotions in PEP patients and could provide a basis for developing emotional intervention therapy.
关键词
Keywords
Phantom eye painEvent-related potentialsExternal emotionsAffective states
references
1 Y. Zhang, M. Zhang, X. Wang, X. ChenRemoval of the eye in a tertiary care center of China: a retrospective study on 573 cases in 20 years Int J Ophthalmol, 8 (5) (2015), pp. 1024-1030, 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.05.31
2 J. Ye, L. Lou, K. Jin, et al.Vision-related quality of life and appearance concerns are associated with anxiety and depression after eye enucleation: a cross-sectional study PLoS One, 10 (8) (2015), Article e0136460, 10.1371/journal.pone.0136460
3 A.M. Andreotti, M.C. Goiato, E.P. Pellizzer, et al.Phantom eye syndrome: a review of the literature Sci World J, 2014 (2014), Article 686493, 10.1155/2014/686493
4 M.L. RasmussenThe eye amputated–consequences of eye amputation with emphasis on clinical aspects, phantom eye syndrome and quality of life Acta Ophthalmol, 88 (thesis2) (2010), pp. 1-26, 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02039.x
5 M.L. Rasmussen, Prause Ju, P.B. ToftPhantom pain after eye amputation Acta Ophthalmol, 89 (1) (2011), pp. 10-16, 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02058.x
6 A.C. Williams, K.D. CraigUpdating the definition of pain Pain, 157 (11) (2016), pp. 2420-2423, 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000613
7 G. Cruccu, A. TruiniA review of neuropathic pain: from guidelines to clinical practice Pain Ther, 6 (Suppl 1) (2017), pp. 35-42, 10.1007/s40122-017-0087-0
8 Y. Luo, T.A. AndersonPhantom limb pain: a review Int Anesthesiol Clin, 54 (2) (2016), pp. 121-139, 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000095
9 J. Andoh, C. Milde, J. Tsao, H. FlorCortical plasticity as a basis of phantom limb pain: fact or fiction? Neuroscience, 387 (2018), pp. 85-91, 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.015
10 B. Subedi, G.T. GrossbergPhantom limb pain: mechanisms and treatment approaches Pain Res Treat, 2011 (2011), Article 864605, 10.1155/2011/864605
11 M.C. Bushnell, M. Ceko, L.A. LowCognitive and emotional control of pain and its disruption in chronic pain Nat Rev Neurosci, 14 (7) (2013), pp. 502-511, 10.1038/nrn3516
12 L.,. Manchikanti, B.,. Fellows, V.,. Pampati, et al.Comparison of psychological status of chronic pain patients and the general population Pain Physician, 5 (1) (2002), pp. 40-48, 10.36076/ppj.2002/5/40
13 S. Duschek, N.S. Werner, N. Limbert, et al.Attentional bias toward negative information in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome Pain Med, 15 (4) (2014), pp. 603-612, 10.1111/pme.12360
14 B. Zhang, Y. Jia, C. Wang, et al.Visual event-related potentials in external emotional conditions in bipolar disorders I and II Neurophysiol Clin, 49 (5) (2019), pp. 359-369, 10.1016/j.neucli.2019.09.002
15 M.D. Rugg, M.G. ColesElectrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition Oxford University Press, NewYork (1995)
16 J. Li, Y. Feng, J. Han, et al.Multi-centered linguistic adaptation and validation of short-form McGill pain questionnaire-2 Chin J Pain Med, 19 (2013), pp. 42-46
17 R.M. Hirschfeld, J.B. Williams, R.L. Spitzer, et al.Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: the Mood Disorder Questionnaire Am J Psychiatr, 157 (11) (2000), pp. 1873-1875, 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1873
18 H. Yang, C. Yuan, T. Liu, et al.Validity of the Chinese version Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) and the optimal cutoff screening bipolar disorders Psychiatr Res, 189 (3) (2011), pp. 446-450, 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.02.007
19 J. Angst, R. Adolfsson, F. Benazzi, et al.The HCL-32: towards a self-assessment tool for hypomanic symptoms in outpatients J Affect Disord, 88 (2) (2005), pp. 217-233, 10.1016/j.jad.2005.05.011
20 H. Yang, C. Yuan, T. Liu, et al.Validity of the 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) in a clinical sample with mood disorders in China BMC Psychiatr, 11 (1) (2011), pp. 1-7, 10.1186/1471-244X-11-84
21 R. Plutchik, H.M. Van PraagInterconvertability of five self-report measures of depression Psychiatr Res, 22 (3) (1987), pp. 243-256, 10.1016/0165-1781(87)90039-4
22 W. Wang, M. Cao, S. Zhu, et al.Zuckerman-Kuhlman's personality questionnaire in patients with major depression SBP J, 30 (8) (2002), pp. 757-764, 10.1016/s0165-1781(00)00194-3
23 P. Lang, M. Bradley, B. CuthbertInternational affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual Tech Rep (2008) A-A8
24 M.M. Bradley, P.J. LangThe international affective digitized sounds (IADS-2): affective ratings of sounds and instruction manual Tech Rep (2007) B-B3
25 A. Delorme, S. MakeigEEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis J Neurosci Methods, 134 (1) (2004), pp. 9-21, 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
26 H. Kazemi, S. Ghassemi, S.M. Fereshtehnejad, et al.Anxiety and depression in patients with amputated limbs suffering from phantom pain: a comparative study with non-phantom chronic pain Int J Prev Med, 4 (2) (2013), pp. 218-225
27 R. Singh, J. Hunter, A. PhilipThe rapid resolution of depression and anxiety symptoms after lower limb amputation Clin Rehabil, 21 (8) (2007), pp. 754-759, 10.1177/0269215507077361
28 S.L. Dubovsky Mania. Continuum (Minneap Minn), 21 (3) (2015), pp. 737-755, 10.1212/01.CON.0000466663.28026.6f
29 I.A. Boggero, J.D. ColeMania reduces perceived pain intensity in patients with chronic pain: preliminary evidence from retrospective archival data J Pain Res, 9 (2016), pp. 147-152, 10.2147/JPR.S88120
30 Q. Dai, J. Wei, X. Shu, Z. FengNegativity bias for sad faces in depression: an event-related potential study Clin Neurophysiol, 127 (12) (2016), pp. 3552-3560, 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.003
31 G. Hajcak, A. MacNamara, D.M. OlvetEvent-related potentials, emotion, and emotion regulation: an integrative review Dev Neuropsychol, 35 (2) (2010), pp. 129-155, 10.1080/87565640903526504
32 P. Montoya, C. Sitges, M. García-Herrera, et al.Abnormal affective modulation of somatosensory brain processing among patients with fibromyalgia Psychosom Med, 67 (6) (2005), pp. 957-963, 10.1097/01.psy.0000188401.55394.18
33 S.J. Troche, M.E. Houlihan, J.F. Connolly, et al.The effect of pain on involuntary and voluntary capture of attention Eur J Pain, 19 (3) (2015), pp. 350-357, 10.1002/ejp.553
34 D.S. Veldhuijzen, J.L. Kenemans, A.J. van Wijck, et al.Processing capacity in chronic pain patients: a visual event-related potentials study Pain, 121 (1-2) (2006), pp. 60-68, 10.1016/j.pain.2005.12.004
35 L. CarretieExogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: a review Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci, 14 (4) (2014), pp. 1228-1258, 10.3758/s13415-014-0270-2
36 A.B. Chica, S. Lasaponara, J. Lupianez, et al.Exogenous attention can capture perceptual consciousness: ERP and behavioural evidence Neuroimage, 51 (3) (2010), pp. 1205-1212, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.002
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies