1. ,Tianjin,China,300384
扫 描 看 全 文
The impact of posterior corneal astigmatism on the surgical planning of toric multifocal intraocular lens implantation[J]. 眼科实践与研究新进展, 2023,3(1):39-46.
Shaochong Bu, Yuanfeng Jiang, Yichen Gao, et al. The impact of posterior corneal astigmatism on the surgical planning of toric multifocal intraocular lens implantation[J]. AOPR, 2023,3(1):39-46.
The impact of posterior corneal astigmatism on the surgical planning of toric multifocal intraocular lens implantation[J]. 眼科实践与研究新进展, 2023,3(1):39-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.08.001.
Shaochong Bu, Yuanfeng Jiang, Yichen Gao, et al. The impact of posterior corneal astigmatism on the surgical planning of toric multifocal intraocular lens implantation[J]. AOPR, 2023,3(1):39-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.08.001.
Purpose,To investigate the influence of posterior corneal astigmatism on the prediction accuracy of toric multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) calculation.,Methods,The keratometric astigmatism measured by Lenstar LS 900 (KCA,L,), keratometric astigmatism (KCA,P,) and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) measured by Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR) were documented and analyzed accordingly. Three deduction models using different parameters were compared. Model 1: KCA,L, + keratometric corneal surgically induced astigmatism (KCSIA, 0.30 D @ 50°); Model 2: KCA,P, + KCSIA); Model 3: TCA + total CSIA (TCSIA, 0.23 D @ 50°). The prediction errors of each model as the difference vector between the actual and the intended residual astigmatism were compared.,Results,Seventy-six eyes implanted with toric multifocal IOLs were included in this study. The vector differences of the actual KCSIA and TCSIA were statistically significant in the total sample and against-the-rule (ATR) subgroup (both ,P, ,<, 0.05). Model 1 deduced the smallest mean values of prediction error, while that of Model 3 were smaller than that of Model 2, both in the total sample and the ATR subgroups (all ,P, ,<, 0.05). Meanwhile, in the total sample and ATR subgroups, the centroid vector magnitudes of Model 3 were smaller than that of Model 1 (0.31 ± 0.76 D and 0.39 ± 0.76 D).,Conclusions,The calculation of toric multifocal IOL should be individualized especially in the ATR eyes for the impact of PCA on the estimation of the preoperative corneal astigmatism and the CSIA.
Purpose,To investigate the influence of posterior corneal astigmatism on the prediction accuracy of toric multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) calculation.,Methods,The keratometric astigmatism measured by Lenstar LS 900 (KCA,L,), keratometric astigmatism (KCA,P,) and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) measured by Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR) were documented and analyzed accordingly. Three deduction models using different parameters were compared. Model 1: KCA,L, + keratometric corneal surgically induced astigmatism (KCSIA, 0.30 D @ 50°); Model 2: KCA,P, + KCSIA); Model 3: TCA + total CSIA (TCSIA, 0.23 D @ 50°). The prediction errors of each model as the difference vector between the actual and the intended residual astigmatism were compared.,Results,Seventy-six eyes implanted with toric multifocal IOLs were included in this study. The vector differences of the actual KCSIA and TCSIA were statistically significant in the total sample and against-the-rule (ATR) subgroup (both ,P, ,<, 0.05). Model 1 deduced the smallest mean values of prediction error, while that of Model 3 were smaller than that of Model 2, both in the total sample and the ATR subgroups (all ,P, ,<, 0.05). Meanwhile, in the total sample and ATR subgroups, the centroid vector magnitudes of Model 3 were smaller than that of Model 1 (0.31 ± 0.76 D and 0.39 ± 0.76 D).,Conclusions,The calculation of toric multifocal IOL should be individualized especially in the ATR eyes for the impact of PCA on the estimation of the preoperative corneal astigmatism and the CSIA.
Posterior corneal astigmatismToric multifocal intraocular lensCorneal surgically induced astigmatism
1 J Zvorničanin, E ZvorničaninPremium intraocular lenses: the past, present and future J Curr Ophthalmol, 30 (4) (2018), pp. 287-296, 10.1016/j.joco.2018.04.003
2 EA Villegas, E Alcón, P ArtalMinimum amount of astigmatism that should be corrected J Cataract Refract Surg, 40 (1) (2014), pp. 13-19, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.09.010
3 J Hao, LZ Tan, L Li, et al.Comparison of visual quality in cataract patients with low astigmatism after ART2 or ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation Int J Ophthalmol, 12 (3) (2019), pp. 424-428, 10.18240/ijo.2019.03.12
4 N Visser, NJ Bauer, RM NuijtsToric intraocular lenses: historical overview, patient selection, IOL calculation, surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications J Cataract Refract Surg, 39 (4) (2013), pp. 624-637, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.02.020
5 N Hirnschall, O Findl, N Bayer, et al.Sources of error in toric intraocular lens power calculation J Refract Surg, 36 (10) (2020), pp. 646-652, 10.3928/1081597X-20200729-03
6 O Reitblat, A Levy, G Kleinmann, et al.Effect of posterior corneal astigmatism on power calculation and alignment of toric intraocular lenses: comparison of methodologies J Cataract Refract Surg, 42 (2) (2016), pp. 217-225, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.036
7 A Abulafia, DD Koch, JT Holladay, et al.Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: IV. Rethinking astigmatism analysis for intraocular lens-based surgery: suggested terminology, analysis, and standards for outcome reports J Cataract Refract Surg, 44 (10) (2018), pp. 1169-1174, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.027
8 NA Alpins, M GogginPractical astigmatism analysis for refractive outcomes in cataract and refractive surgery Surv Ophthalmol, 49 (1) (2004), pp. 109-122, 10.1016/j.survophthal.2003.10.010
9 G Savini, K NaeserAn analysis of the factors influencing the residual refractive astigmatism after cataract surgery with toric intraocular lenses Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 56 (2) (2015), pp. 827-835, 10.1167/iovs.14-15903
10 JD Ho, CY Tsai, SW LiouAccuracy of corneal astigmatism estimation by neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement Am J Ophthalmol, 147 (5) (2009), pp. 788-795, 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.020 e7952
11 DD Koch, SF Ali, MP Weikert, et al.Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism J Cataract Refract Surg, 38 (12) (2012), pp. 2080-2087, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.036
12 M Hosny, A Badawy, L Khazbak, et al.Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism in a sample of Egyptian population Clin Ophthalmol, 14 (2020), pp. 3325-3330, 10.2147/OPTH.S265647
13 Y Zhang, H Chen, Y Zhang, et al.The differences of corneal astigmatism in different populations and its quantitative analysis Afr Health Sci, 20 (2) (2020), pp. 775-778, 10.4314/ahs.v20i2.30
14 K Naeser, G Savini, JF BregnhojAge-related changes in with-the-rule and oblique corneal astigmatism Acta Ophthalmol, 96 (6) (2018), pp. 600-606, 10.1111/aos.13683
15 JL Liang, XL Xing, XT Yang, et al.Clinical comparison analysis in surgically induced astigmatism of the total, anterior and posterior cornea after 2.2-mm versus 3.0-mm clear corneal incision cataract surgery Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi, 55 (7) (2019), pp. 495-501, 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2019.07.004
16 X Li, X Chen, S He, et al.Effect of 1.8-mm steep-axis clear corneal incision on the posterior corneal astigmatism in candidates for toric IOL implantation BMC Ophthalmol, 20 (1) (2020), p. 187, 10.1186/s12886-020-01456-3
17 T Kohnen, F Loffler, M Herzog, et al.Tomographic analysis of anterior and posterior surgically induced astigmatism after 2.2 mm temporal clear corneal incisions in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery J Cataract Refract Surg, 45 (11) (2019), pp. 1602-1611, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.010
18 JT Holladay, G PettitImproving toric intraocular lens calculations using total surgically induced astigmatism for a 2.5 mm temporal incision J Cataract Refract Surg, 45 (3) (2019), pp. 272-283, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.028
19 HA Arruda, JM Pereira, A Neves, et al.Lenstar LS 900 versus Pentacam-AXL: analysis of refractive outcomes and predicted refraction Sci Rep, 11 (1) (2021), p. 1449, 10.1038/s41598-021-81146-2
20 S Fityo, J Bühren, M Shajari, et al.Keratometry versus total corneal refractive power: analysis of measurement repeatability with 5 different devices in normal eyes with low astigmatism J Cataract Refract Surg, 42 (4) (2016), pp. 569-576, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.046
21 G Savini, K NæserAn analysis of the factors influencing the residual refractive astigmatism after cataract surgery with toric intraocular lenses [published correction appears in Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 56 (2) (2015), pp. 827-835, 10.1167/iovs.14-15903 2015 Apr;56(4):2303
22 L Zhang, ME Sy, H Mai, et al.Effect of posterior corneal astigmatism on refractive outcomes after toric intraocular lens implantation J Cataract Refract Surg, 41 (1) (2015), pp. 84-89, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.033
23 AT Epitropoulos, C Matossian, GJ Berdy, et al.Effect of tear osmolarity on repeatability of keratometry for cataract surgery planning J Cataract Refract Surg, 41 (8) (2015), pp. 1672-1677, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.016
24 B Gjerdrum, KG Gundersen, PO Lundmark, et al.Repeatability of OCT-based versus Scheimpflug- and reflection-based keratometry in patients with hyperosmolar and normal tear film Clin Ophthalmol, 14 (2020), pp. 3991-4003, 10.2147/OPTH.S280868 Published 2020 Nov 18
25 JP Craig, KK Nichols, EK Akpek, et al.TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report Ocul Surf, 15 (3) (2017), pp. 276-283, 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008
26 V Röggla, C Leydolt, D Schartmüller, et al.Influence of artificial tears on keratometric measurements in cataract patients Am J Ophthalmol, 221 (2021), pp. 1-8, 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.024
27 MN Jensen, AP Søndergaard, C Pommerencke, et al.Variations in keratometric values (K-value) after administration of three different eye drops - effects on the intraocular lens calculations in relation to cataract surgery Acta Ophthalmol, 98 (6) (2020), pp. 613-617, 10.1111/aos.14408
28 CH Yoon, MK KimImproving the toric intraocular lens calculation by considering posterior corneal astigmatism and surgically-induced corneal astigmatism Kor J Ophthalmol, 32 (4) (2018), pp. 265-272, 10.3341/kjo.2017.0108
29 J Skrzypecki, M Sanghvi Patel, LH SuhPerformance of the Barrett Toric Calculator with and without measurements of posterior corneal curvature Eye, 33 (11) (2019), pp. 1762-1767, 10.1038/s41433-019-0489-9
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构